This is an entry in a year-long project to post-blog the demobilisation experience for British servicemen at the end of the Second World War. See here for an introduction to the project and here for a brief overview of the demobilisation process.
"February and March figures of Army demobilisation will be a big disappointment to the boys," complains the John Bull editorial page this week:
Minister of Labour George Isaacs will be the first to say so. Though the main decision on demob rates rests with the service departments, it is Isaacs who has to carry the parliamentary baby.
Everything hinges on the services' claims that they must have 1,900,000 people in uniform in midsummer. If that midsummer figure were reduced to 1,400,000 it would be possible to keep up the winter rate of Army releases. As it is, the Army is going to bear an unfair share of the occupation and other burdens in the next few months ... it is essential to know whether ddiscussions are to take place between the three services to use both RAF and Navy in occupation and police duties.
In the German ports our sailors do good work ashore in guarding dumps and patrolling. Why should their duties be restricted to the ports? The soldier's complaint - that on age and service release he may come out of the Forces months after his comrade in the Navy who joined up at the same time - is unanswerable ...
Recent Comments